Session Spotlight: Research Methods Roulette

Yet another of the amazing Tutorials at UXPA2013 comes from Susan Mercer and Dan Berlin. In Research Methods Roulette, you’ll gain key insights into which UX research methods should be applied under which circumstances. 

Interested in this tutorial? Register now! (As of this writing, there are still a few early bird slots left!)

And now, Susan and Dan:

Susan Mercer and Dan BerlinWhat are your go-to methods for user research? If you’re like many of us, you rely heavily on interviews and moderated usability tests. But are those methods going to give you the information that you need? Or are there other methods out there that are better for your particular project?

Are you trying to uncover new insights into how prospective users perform certain tasks today? Contextual Inquiry might be a better method than interviews. Are you trying to understand the context in which customers use your mobile application for payments in retail environments? Ethnographic observation is likely a better method than in-lab moderated usability testing.

The key is to understand your project goals, and from that, you can pick the right research tool for the job. In our tutorial, Research Method Roulette, Susan Mercer and Dan Berlin of Mad*Pow will review different research techniques, discuss when they are applicable, and convey the best practices for conducting the different types of research.

In our full-day tutorial, we’ll cover various types of research methods – their pros, cons, and for what situations they’re best suited:

  • Ethnography
  • In-depth interviews
  • Surveys
  • Diary studies
  • Contextual inquiry
  • Collaging
  • Card-sorting
  • Focus groups

We’ll then take a deep dive into different types of usability studies:

  • In-person, moderated
  • Remote, moderated
  • Asynchronous, unmoderated
  • Desirability studies
  • Eye-tracking and biometrics

But don’t worry – this won’t be a full day of boring lecture! We have several activities planned for attendees to select and plan their own research studies for different situations. This gives you a chance to put in action what you’ve learned and get some experience that you can take back to the office.

The final part of the tutorial will cover research best practices – all the things that will help turn a challenging project into a smooth-running one:

  • Ethics
  • Documentation
  • Recruiting
  • Client management
  • Note taking
  • Study moderation
  • Qualitative and quantitative analysis
  • Reporting

Our goal is to provide an information-packed tutorial to give new practitioners a head start in facing research projects, and to provide some new perspectives to more experienced practitioners. Most importantly, we want attendees to learn how to choose a research method for their project – no matter what the situation.

We hope to see you there!

Session Spotlight: Perspectives on Design Patterns

For this week’s Session Spotlight, we focus on one of our fabulous workshops! Workshops are 3-hour working sessions in which attendees and a facilitator work collaboratively on a problem or technique. Attendance is limited to maximize the interaction, and workshop facilitators choose attendees based on pre-conference activities specific to each workshop. Interested in exploring this year’s workshops? Check them out in the 3:00 timeslot on Thursday afternoon.

 

Lija Hogan

Lija Hogan

And now, Lija Hogan shares more information about her workshop, “Perspectives on Design Patterns: Recognizing the tradeoffs in commonly used approaches.”

UX designers never work in a vacuum.  We collaborate with graphic designers, SEO specialists, developers, content managers, subject matter experts, and a variety of others to craft stellar user interactions.  Often, due to resource or time constraints, all of these roles are not covered on project teams or are only consulted at a single point in the process when it would be optimal to be involved over the life of the project.  This sometimes means that the vital input these practitioners would have is missing in the final product and that has a negative impact on the quality of the user experience.

I often wish that I could set aside an entire day each week just to read all of the new material produced in a week’s time across the SEO, information architecture, content management, UX, graphic design, and search disciplines among others.  It’s impossible to know everything about everything, especially at the rate of change that we’re currently experiencing in the mobile setting. I would love to explore the possibility of creating a resource that brings together the perspectives of practitioners across UX-related disciplines that helps provide insight into the pros, cons, and considerations associated with the common design patterns that many sites use.

For instance, we see many sites that are moving toward using tabs to house content on a single page:

Tabbed Interface

tabbed interface

 

This approach has SEO implications because, depending on how the page is architected, search engines will index it quite differently.

Solution 1 – Content on each tab stands on its own and should be ranked individually – a separate listing on a SERP.

Solution 2 – Content that appears on each tab does not stand on its own and should be regarded as being from a single source – a single listing on a SERP.

Additionally, it might be best to use to use solution 1 if you are designing for a content site, and solution 2 if you are designing for an ecommerce site.  From a content perspective, it might be useful here to discuss what types of information structures best facilitate comparison.  See what I mean?

During the workshop, I’d like to start a discussion around what practitioners feel might be the most crucial things to know.  For example, which disciplines are the most sensible to cover?  What level of detail would be best?  Does it make sense to examine the mobile platform first, or web?  What level of granularity would be most appropriate – elements of a page, or an entire logical page?  Would it be best to start with a website and work up to a book?

Register today and join me on Thursday, July 11th to talk about these ideas and more at the UXPA 2013 conference!

Call for On-Site Conference Volunteers

Jingya Yu, UXPA2012 conference volunteer

Jingya Yu, UXPA2012 conference volunteer
(photo courtesy of Tom Tullis)

The 2013 UXPA Conference will provide inspiration and stimulation through workshops,
exhibits, and tutorials to increase our attendees’ passion for leading the way in user experience. In addition, the conference aims to provide sessions to explore all the collaborative relationships, techniques, and team-oriented practices that enrich the user experience profession.

We are building a team of committed volunteers to help with a variety of behind-the-scenes activities such as staffing the information booth, helping at the registration desk, and assisting session chairs and tutorial instructors. In return, volunteers receive greatly reduced conference registration fees and the opportunity to interact closely with leaders in the user experience field who will be attending the conference as speakers/presenters, conference planners,
and participants.

 

Learn More

To learn more about the UXPA 2013 conference and the volunteering opportunity (benefits, expectations, fees, application process), please visit the conference volunteer site. If you have any follow-up questions or need more information, please do not hesitate to contact us. We look forward to hearing from you!

 

Sign Up

If you are interested in this unique opportunity to volunteer for the UXPA 2013 conference in Washington, D.C., please complete the online volunteer application as soon as possible. We will make our selections in a couple of weeks.    

 

Have Questions?

If you need more information or have questions, contact the UXPA 2013 conference volunteer committee at volunteers2013@uxpa.org.

 

Thanks for your consideration!

Promise Ziegler, UXPA 2013 Onsite Volunteer Chair
volunteers2013@uxpa.org

I’m registered. Are you?

Conference registration is open!We made the hard choices, in part to make your choice easier. Register now. You won’t regret it.

I have absolutely no doubt that this is one of the strongest programs UXPA has ever had.

Tuesday is full of amazing tutorials on everything from mobile to gamification to accessibility to creative collaboration.

Wednesday, the main conference begins. We are working on an amazing speaker to kick off the event, so you’ll be energized and primed to learn about UX and Agile, look at accessibility from a different angle, and take an international perspective on gestural interfaces. (Wednesday night? Party!)

Thursday, we continue, with more including a look at UX research methods and prototyping. Idea Markets are held on Thursday, as are six fantastic workshops covering such topics as improving requirements,  Agile and Lean, and UX Strategy. Thursday afternoon also includes options for exploring the city like a local, with several members of the DC chapter serving as your tour guides.

On Friday, we wrap things up with a number of scheduled talks on information architecture, collaboration with developers, and how people around the world manage their digital identity. Add posters, Unconference, a closing speaker (and another party!), and we have yet another amazing day of networking, collaboration, and downright UX geekery.

We’ll be showcasing a number of sessions from the program as we get closer to the event, but don’t wait for that! Be one of the first 200 people and save $100 ($50 for students) off of the full conference registration rates.

As always, let us know if you have any questions, and we will see you in Washington, D.C. in July!

Best,
Danielle

PS – After you’re registered, let everyone know you’re coming by listing yourself on our Lanyrd page!

Thank you!!

thank you note on post-it

Creative Commons licensed image from flickr user Ben Fredericson (xjrlokix)

UXers, you continue to amaze me.

Both the reviewer survey and submissions are now closed. I’m thrilled to report that a record 413 of you signed up to be reviewers! And it’s a good thing, too, because we have over 300 submissions to evaluate!

Without a quality program, there’s no conference. So thank you, thank you, THANK YOU for everything you are doing to help ensure this year’s event is top-notch.

What’s next?
Good question. Here’s how it works:

  1. First, a small team looks over EVERY submission to make sure they really are anonymous. We’re pretty hardcore about reviews being purely about merit.
  2. Then we hand them over to our fabulous team of reviewers. Reviewers will be assigned 3-5 submissions to evaluate based on their responses to the reviewer survey. (If you said you were interested in mobile, we’ll try to direct those kinds of submissions to you. Ditto for specific submission types, like Tutorials or Ignites.)
  3. The reviewers look carefully at each of their assigned submissions and ask themselves questions like, “Is this any good? Would I want to go to this session? Do I even have enough information here to understand what the speaker is planning to talk about? They have two weeks to do this very important work.
  4. Subcommittee chairs look at the reviewers’ feedback and make recommendations about which submissions they think should be accepted.
  5. A subset of the conference committee will meet in person during the second weekend in March to establish the conference program.
  6. Allowing some time for follow-ups of any issues that come up during that meeting, submitters will be notified of their acceptance status in late March.

 

Then what?
More exciting things!

  • Registration will open just as soon as we can let you know what it is you’re registering for (that is, what the conference program looks like).
  • And there will likely be a second call for proposals for Idea Markets and Posters, so if you didn’t get your submission in, or if your talk didn’t quite make the program, that’s another avenue you can pursue.

 

As always, looking forward to seeing all of your smiling faces in Washington, DC!

-Danielle & Christina

Government Track at UXPA 2013 DC

Are you working for the government (any government)? Or are you doing government-related work? Have you done research that would be of particular interest to government usability practitioners? Consider submitting it to UXPA 2013!

Because UXPA will be in Washington, DC this year, we’re hoping that many of our colleagues in the government will join us in a special government track this year. The sessions will be part of the main conference and open to all, but the sessions in this track may be of particular interest to those doing work in or for their government. We are hoping for a variety of submissions representing the local, state/provincial, and national levels of countries all over the world.

So if you have an idea for presentation, panel, poster, or any other UXPA session that you think might be especially of interest to government usability professionals, please submit your proposal! The deadline is February 6! If you have any questions, please contact Jean Fox at government2013@uxpa.org.

A Conference Story

Amazingly, though I am an admitted conference junkie, this story is not mine. It’s my husband’s. He’s a biochemical engineer whose professional conference sessions have fun titles like “Evaluating and Selecting Single-Use Bioreactors for Antibodies & Biosimilars Manufacturing” and “Modeling Multicomponent Protein Adsorption Kinetics in Overloaded Ion Exchange Chromatography with Macroporous and Polymer Grafted Stationary Phases.” (Don’t get me wrong – I’m glad someone pays attention to such things. But I’m equally glad I am not that person.)

He once told me about a conference session he went to on bioreactor construction (really) with an electrical engineer. When they came out, the electrical engineer was gushing with enthusiasm over how much he had learned and how interesting the session was. Like McKayla Maroney, though, my husband was not impressed. “I covered most of that in undergrad,” he told me. “Besides, we were manufacturers. We didn’t build bioreactors. We just bought them and used them as-configured.”

I know what you’re thinking. What can we learn from this not-at-all-UX-related-story just a few short days before submissions open for UXPA 2013? Four things:

1. If you have ever sat through a conference presentation where you learned almost nothing, that means you know enough about something that you can speak about it knowledgeably at a conference. My husband should have been giving that talk, not listening to it.

2. We don’t all know the same things. If you think everyone already knows about the things you know about, you’re wrong. They don’t. That speaker very easily could have assumed everyone in attendance was like my husband and knew this already. But if he had, the electrical engineer never would have had that awesome experience.

3. Aim for a targeted talk. Don’t try to be everything to everyone. If you do, half of your audience is going to be disappointed. Know what you’re going to say, and give people enough information to determine if the topic is germane to their interests. (Did they learn all of this in college, or will it be new to them? Is it specific to a specific industry? If so, is it the one they are in or hoping to get into?) If the session description had been clear, my husband and others like him could have made better use of their conference time.

4. Sometimes, your spouse’s stories aren’t as useless as they seem. ;)

There you have it. Some more anti-excuses to submitting, building on what Giles Colborne, Donna Spencer, Amy Kidd, Jim Ross, and many others have already told you.

Submissions open in a few days, so get ready!

Cheers!
Christina & Danielle

December Conference Update

Happy December, everyone! We’ve been pretty busy since our last update, and I can’t wait to tell you all about it.

First, thanks to everyone who participated in our volunteer survey. We now have a list of 73 (!) eager and qualified volunteers. You guys are GREAT! We’ve been working through the list to form the committee, and we hope to make an official committee announcement in the next few weeks. For those who didn’t fill out the survey or who might not have quite as much time to offer, please consider helping us review submissions when the time comes. We like for each submission to get at least 5 reviews, and we’re hoping for about 300 submissions this year, which means 1,500 reviews! We’ll definitely need all hands on deck.

cozy fireBut before we can review, people need to submit! Submissions will open in January. Fortunately, that position you assume when warming your toes by a crackling winter fire (or, for my lucky friends in the Southern Hemisphere, when lounging poolside) is also one that nicely accommodates a notepad, tablet, or laptop. So start making some notes and organizing your thoughts! (Don’t worry too much about format just yet – almost all submissions will be exclusively via web form this time around! Woo hoo! Bye bye, Word templates!)

Think you don’t have what it takes? We respectfully disagree.  Jim Ross has a good counterargument for every excuse you can come up with. And Giles Colborne has a great set of suggestions for writing a killer proposal. So just do it already, ok? Ok.

Need a little inspiration? Check out pictures from last year’s event, conveniently located on our new UXPA 2013 Web site! http://uxpa2013.org just went live! That site is specific to the DC event and will include up-to-date information on submission and notification dates and registration information as it becomes available.

You’ll hear from us again soon. In the meantime, please keep sending your thoughtful comments, ideas, and questions to conf2013@uxpa.org.

Happy Holidays!
Danielle and Christina

Portion of image licensed under Creative Commons: (Joseph Mischyshyn) / CC BY-SA 2.0