Session Spotlight: Research Methods Roulette

Yet another of the amazing Tutorials at UXPA2013 comes from Susan Mercer and Dan Berlin. In Research Methods Roulette, you’ll gain key insights into which UX research methods should be applied under which circumstances. 

Interested in this tutorial? Register now! (As of this writing, there are still a few early bird slots left!)

And now, Susan and Dan:

Susan Mercer and Dan BerlinWhat are your go-to methods for user research? If you’re like many of us, you rely heavily on interviews and moderated usability tests. But are those methods going to give you the information that you need? Or are there other methods out there that are better for your particular project?

Are you trying to uncover new insights into how prospective users perform certain tasks today? Contextual Inquiry might be a better method than interviews. Are you trying to understand the context in which customers use your mobile application for payments in retail environments? Ethnographic observation is likely a better method than in-lab moderated usability testing.

The key is to understand your project goals, and from that, you can pick the right research tool for the job. In our tutorial, Research Method Roulette, Susan Mercer and Dan Berlin of Mad*Pow will review different research techniques, discuss when they are applicable, and convey the best practices for conducting the different types of research.

In our full-day tutorial, we’ll cover various types of research methods – their pros, cons, and for what situations they’re best suited:

  • Ethnography
  • In-depth interviews
  • Surveys
  • Diary studies
  • Contextual inquiry
  • Collaging
  • Card-sorting
  • Focus groups

We’ll then take a deep dive into different types of usability studies:

  • In-person, moderated
  • Remote, moderated
  • Asynchronous, unmoderated
  • Desirability studies
  • Eye-tracking and biometrics

But don’t worry – this won’t be a full day of boring lecture! We have several activities planned for attendees to select and plan their own research studies for different situations. This gives you a chance to put in action what you’ve learned and get some experience that you can take back to the office.

The final part of the tutorial will cover research best practices – all the things that will help turn a challenging project into a smooth-running one:

  • Ethics
  • Documentation
  • Recruiting
  • Client management
  • Note taking
  • Study moderation
  • Qualitative and quantitative analysis
  • Reporting

Our goal is to provide an information-packed tutorial to give new practitioners a head start in facing research projects, and to provide some new perspectives to more experienced practitioners. Most importantly, we want attendees to learn how to choose a research method for their project – no matter what the situation.

We hope to see you there!

Session Spotlight: Perspectives on Design Patterns

For this week’s Session Spotlight, we focus on one of our fabulous workshops! Workshops are 3-hour working sessions in which attendees and a facilitator work collaboratively on a problem or technique. Attendance is limited to maximize the interaction, and workshop facilitators choose attendees based on pre-conference activities specific to each workshop. Interested in exploring this year’s workshops? Check them out in the 3:00 timeslot on Thursday afternoon.

 

Lija Hogan

Lija Hogan

And now, Lija Hogan shares more information about her workshop, “Perspectives on Design Patterns: Recognizing the tradeoffs in commonly used approaches.”

UX designers never work in a vacuum.  We collaborate with graphic designers, SEO specialists, developers, content managers, subject matter experts, and a variety of others to craft stellar user interactions.  Often, due to resource or time constraints, all of these roles are not covered on project teams or are only consulted at a single point in the process when it would be optimal to be involved over the life of the project.  This sometimes means that the vital input these practitioners would have is missing in the final product and that has a negative impact on the quality of the user experience.

I often wish that I could set aside an entire day each week just to read all of the new material produced in a week’s time across the SEO, information architecture, content management, UX, graphic design, and search disciplines among others.  It’s impossible to know everything about everything, especially at the rate of change that we’re currently experiencing in the mobile setting. I would love to explore the possibility of creating a resource that brings together the perspectives of practitioners across UX-related disciplines that helps provide insight into the pros, cons, and considerations associated with the common design patterns that many sites use.

For instance, we see many sites that are moving toward using tabs to house content on a single page:

Tabbed Interface

tabbed interface

 

This approach has SEO implications because, depending on how the page is architected, search engines will index it quite differently.

Solution 1 – Content on each tab stands on its own and should be ranked individually – a separate listing on a SERP.

Solution 2 – Content that appears on each tab does not stand on its own and should be regarded as being from a single source – a single listing on a SERP.

Additionally, it might be best to use to use solution 1 if you are designing for a content site, and solution 2 if you are designing for an ecommerce site.  From a content perspective, it might be useful here to discuss what types of information structures best facilitate comparison.  See what I mean?

During the workshop, I’d like to start a discussion around what practitioners feel might be the most crucial things to know.  For example, which disciplines are the most sensible to cover?  What level of detail would be best?  Does it make sense to examine the mobile platform first, or web?  What level of granularity would be most appropriate – elements of a page, or an entire logical page?  Would it be best to start with a website and work up to a book?

Register today and join me on Thursday, July 11th to talk about these ideas and more at the UXPA 2013 conference!

Call for On-Site Conference Volunteers

Jingya Yu, UXPA2012 conference volunteer

Jingya Yu, UXPA2012 conference volunteer
(photo courtesy of Tom Tullis)

The 2013 UXPA Conference will provide inspiration and stimulation through workshops,
exhibits, and tutorials to increase our attendees’ passion for leading the way in user experience. In addition, the conference aims to provide sessions to explore all the collaborative relationships, techniques, and team-oriented practices that enrich the user experience profession.

We are building a team of committed volunteers to help with a variety of behind-the-scenes activities such as staffing the information booth, helping at the registration desk, and assisting session chairs and tutorial instructors. In return, volunteers receive greatly reduced conference registration fees and the opportunity to interact closely with leaders in the user experience field who will be attending the conference as speakers/presenters, conference planners,
and participants.

 

Learn More

To learn more about the UXPA 2013 conference and the volunteering opportunity (benefits, expectations, fees, application process), please visit the conference volunteer site. If you have any follow-up questions or need more information, please do not hesitate to contact us. We look forward to hearing from you!

 

Sign Up

If you are interested in this unique opportunity to volunteer for the UXPA 2013 conference in Washington, D.C., please complete the online volunteer application as soon as possible. We will make our selections in a couple of weeks.    

 

Have Questions?

If you need more information or have questions, contact the UXPA 2013 conference volunteer committee at volunteers2013@uxpa.org.

 

Thanks for your consideration!

Promise Ziegler, UXPA 2013 Onsite Volunteer Chair
volunteers2013@uxpa.org

Government Track at UXPA 2013 DC

Are you working for the government (any government)? Or are you doing government-related work? Have you done research that would be of particular interest to government usability practitioners? Consider submitting it to UXPA 2013!

Because UXPA will be in Washington, DC this year, we’re hoping that many of our colleagues in the government will join us in a special government track this year. The sessions will be part of the main conference and open to all, but the sessions in this track may be of particular interest to those doing work in or for their government. We are hoping for a variety of submissions representing the local, state/provincial, and national levels of countries all over the world.

So if you have an idea for presentation, panel, poster, or any other UXPA session that you think might be especially of interest to government usability professionals, please submit your proposal! The deadline is February 6! If you have any questions, please contact Jean Fox at government2013@uxpa.org.

A Conference Story

Amazingly, though I am an admitted conference junkie, this story is not mine. It’s my husband’s. He’s a biochemical engineer whose professional conference sessions have fun titles like “Evaluating and Selecting Single-Use Bioreactors for Antibodies & Biosimilars Manufacturing” and “Modeling Multicomponent Protein Adsorption Kinetics in Overloaded Ion Exchange Chromatography with Macroporous and Polymer Grafted Stationary Phases.” (Don’t get me wrong – I’m glad someone pays attention to such things. But I’m equally glad I am not that person.)

He once told me about a conference session he went to on bioreactor construction (really) with an electrical engineer. When they came out, the electrical engineer was gushing with enthusiasm over how much he had learned and how interesting the session was. Like McKayla Maroney, though, my husband was not impressed. “I covered most of that in undergrad,” he told me. “Besides, we were manufacturers. We didn’t build bioreactors. We just bought them and used them as-configured.”

I know what you’re thinking. What can we learn from this not-at-all-UX-related-story just a few short days before submissions open for UXPA 2013? Four things:

1. If you have ever sat through a conference presentation where you learned almost nothing, that means you know enough about something that you can speak about it knowledgeably at a conference. My husband should have been giving that talk, not listening to it.

2. We don’t all know the same things. If you think everyone already knows about the things you know about, you’re wrong. They don’t. That speaker very easily could have assumed everyone in attendance was like my husband and knew this already. But if he had, the electrical engineer never would have had that awesome experience.

3. Aim for a targeted talk. Don’t try to be everything to everyone. If you do, half of your audience is going to be disappointed. Know what you’re going to say, and give people enough information to determine if the topic is germane to their interests. (Did they learn all of this in college, or will it be new to them? Is it specific to a specific industry? If so, is it the one they are in or hoping to get into?) If the session description had been clear, my husband and others like him could have made better use of their conference time.

4. Sometimes, your spouse’s stories aren’t as useless as they seem. ;)

There you have it. Some more anti-excuses to submitting, building on what Giles Colborne, Donna Spencer, Amy Kidd, Jim Ross, and many others have already told you.

Submissions open in a few days, so get ready!

Cheers!
Christina & Danielle

December Conference Update

Happy December, everyone! We’ve been pretty busy since our last update, and I can’t wait to tell you all about it.

First, thanks to everyone who participated in our volunteer survey. We now have a list of 73 (!) eager and qualified volunteers. You guys are GREAT! We’ve been working through the list to form the committee, and we hope to make an official committee announcement in the next few weeks. For those who didn’t fill out the survey or who might not have quite as much time to offer, please consider helping us review submissions when the time comes. We like for each submission to get at least 5 reviews, and we’re hoping for about 300 submissions this year, which means 1,500 reviews! We’ll definitely need all hands on deck.

cozy fireBut before we can review, people need to submit! Submissions will open in January. Fortunately, that position you assume when warming your toes by a crackling winter fire (or, for my lucky friends in the Southern Hemisphere, when lounging poolside) is also one that nicely accommodates a notepad, tablet, or laptop. So start making some notes and organizing your thoughts! (Don’t worry too much about format just yet – almost all submissions will be exclusively via web form this time around! Woo hoo! Bye bye, Word templates!)

Think you don’t have what it takes? We respectfully disagree.  Jim Ross has a good counterargument for every excuse you can come up with. And Giles Colborne has a great set of suggestions for writing a killer proposal. So just do it already, ok? Ok.

Need a little inspiration? Check out pictures from last year’s event, conveniently located on our new UXPA 2013 Web site! http://uxpa2013.org just went live! That site is specific to the DC event and will include up-to-date information on submission and notification dates and registration information as it becomes available.

You’ll hear from us again soon. In the meantime, please keep sending your thoughtful comments, ideas, and questions to conf2013@uxpa.org.

Happy Holidays!
Danielle and Christina

Portion of image licensed under Creative Commons: (Joseph Mischyshyn) / CC BY-SA 2.0

Drumroll, please…

bullhornWe’re really excited to begin sharing details about the first of UXPA’s two 2013 conference events!

Washington, DC will be the location for the first event. Specifically, the event will be held July 9-12, 2013 at the Washington Hilton, a newly-renovated, contemporary, urban retreat near DC’s most sought-after neighborhoods. We think the location is going to make for a fantastic experience, with great space, great food, and great entertainment opportunities. We are especially excited to work with a strong local team that has held the successful User Focus conference in DC for several years.

And because making announcements is so fun, we’ve just got to share the theme for the event – Collaboration. We imagine just about every UX professional can relate to the need for collaboration both within the UX profession and with people outside our profession. Since the 2013 conferences will be heavy collaborations with other events, we thought this theme especially fitting.

While we are working hard to organize an exciting event, we know the real value for everyone is in the program content. We anticipate the official Call for Proposals will go out sometime in November, so start thinking about your submissions now and also consider signing up to review others’ submissions.

Finally, watch this space for more information about both the DC and China conferences! In the meantime, if you have a thought or suggestion or would like to volunteer to help in any way, please email chair2013@uxpa.org.

More to come!

Christina and Danielle

This is no easy chair: UXPA 2013 Conference Planning

When Amy Kidd asked me to be her co-chair for 2012, I was really excited.  Nervous, but excited.  I had no idea what it would take.  But I knew she would help me along.  After all, Amy already had a year of chairing under her belt.  But every conference is unique: different locations pose different challenges, and changes to the association and conference model compound the uniqueness.  So when the 2012 conference was done, I began to panic.  Who would be my copilot?  And what did I learn during my experience with Amy that would help me select a co-chair?

I knew I needed someone: planning two major events on two continents in one year AS A VOLUNTEER is a crazy undertaking.  I knew I would have amazing leadership from Cory Lebson (DC) and Jason Huang (China).  I was also relieved that Nicole Tafoya would continue to bring her expertise to the planning.  But I needed someone to provide a continuum across both events: to plan together, to learn together, to commiserate and to celebrate.  I needed someone to lead for the future. I also needed someone whom I trust, respect, and who can deal with my personality for a year of intensive work.

Enter Danielle Cooley.

A picture of Danielle Cooley that I stole from LinkedIn.

 

 

 

If you’ve met, worked with, or in any way engaged Danielle, you know that I made an awesome choice (if I do say so myself).  Danielle has been a committed member of our association, a supporter of our profession, and has dedicated a lot of her time to both participating in conferences (presentations, facilitating workshops and conducting tutorials) as well as organizing conferences (running local events, volunteering with UXPA).  Danielle knows UX.  Danielle knows people.  And I’m lucky that I get to work with her this year.

We’ll be building out the conference committee soon, so if you’re interested in helping build UXPA, creating an amazing conference experience, or working with Danielle or me, please contact us: chair2013@uxpa.org or tweet it out: @uxpa_int. We’d love to work with you.

Welcome, Danielle! We’re lucky to have you!

Christina

By the way…

If you’re curious about your 2013 UXPA Conference Co-chairs, here’s our very snoopable online presences:

Danielle – @dgcooley ; http://www.linkedin.com/in/dgcooley

Christina – @UXtina ; http://www.linkedin.com/in/xtinayork